In brief
Return-to-office strategies often fail when organisations cannot clearly explain why employees are being asked to return. This article explores how unclear purpose creates confusion, weakens trust and leads to inconsistent implementation, and outlines how HR can strengthen the rationale behind RTO decisions.
Part 1 of 5 in The People Space return-to-office series. Back to full series
Many return-to-office strategies struggle before they are even implemented.
The issue is not resistance to change or the complexity of hybrid work. It is the absence of a clear, shared purpose behind the policy.
Ask a group of employees why they are being asked to spend more time in the office and the answers often vary.
Some will say it is about collaboration. Others will assume it is about performance. Some will interpret it as a lack of trust. Others will see it as a signal about culture.
When the rationale is open to interpretation, people fill the gaps themselves. That is where friction begins.
When the rationale is unclear, people create their own explanations. That is where friction begins.
The problem
A policy without a clear purpose creates confusion and resistance.
Many organisations introduce return-to-office expectations using broad language. Phrases like “strengthening culture” or “improving collaboration” are common. They sound reasonable, but they are rarely defined in a way that connects to day-to-day work.
Without that clarity:
- managers struggle to explain the decision to their teams
- employees question whether the requirement is justified
- different leaders interpret the policy in different ways
- expectations become inconsistent across the organisation
What looks like a simple directive quickly becomes a source of tension.
Why this happens
Return-to-office decisions are often made at pace and under pressure.
Leaders are balancing multiple concerns:
- productivity
- engagement
- culture
- visibility
- real estate costs
In that environment, it is tempting to move quickly and signal direction through policy.
But policy is not the same as strategy.
A strategy explains:
- what problem you are trying to solve
- what success looks like
- how different choices support that outcome
Without that foundation, return-to-office becomes a rule rather than a considered approach to how work should happen.
What the evidence suggests
Research over the past few years has consistently pointed to a gap between perception and reality when it comes to hybrid performance.
Leaders often report lower confidence in productivity when they cannot see work happening. Employees, however, report that they are able to maintain or improve output in flexible environments. This pattern has been observed across multiple studies since 2020.
This disconnect matters because when leaders act on perception rather than clearly defined outcomes, policies are more likely to focus on presence. That can reinforce the idea that being seen is more important than what is delivered.
Over time that erodes trust and makes it harder to have credible conversations about performance.
What HR should do next
HR has a critical role in closing this gap. This does not require rewriting policy from scratch. It starts with sharper questions.
1. Define the problem you are trying to solve
Is the concern about collaboration, onboarding, innovation, performance or something else?
Different problems require different responses. A single rule rarely addresses them all.
2. Translate broad goals into practical outcomes
If collaboration is the goal, what does better collaboration look like in practice?
Which activities genuinely benefit from being in the same space?
3. Equip leaders to communicate clearly
Managers need more than a policy document. They need a simple, consistent explanation they can use with their teams.
4. Test for consistency
If different leaders explain the policy in different ways, the rationale is not yet clear enough.
Key takeaways
- unclear rationale is one of the most common reasons RTO strategies create friction
- broad language without practical meaning leads to inconsistent interpretation
- policies are more effective when they are anchored in clearly defined outcomes
- HR can strengthen credibility by helping leaders articulate and communicate a clear purpose
Continue the series
Next: Why one-size-fits-all return-to-office policies create fairness problems. Read Part 2
About the author
